2020ok  Directory of FREE Online Books and FREE eBooks

Free eBooks > History > Americas > United States > General > Canonical And Uncanonical Gosples

Canonical And Uncanonical Gosples

by W.e.barnes

Download Book
(Respecting the intellectual property of others is utmost important to us, we make every effort to make sure we only link to legitimate sites, such as those sites owned by authors and publishers. If you have any questions about these links, please contact us.)

link 1

About Book

Book Description
Text extracted from opening pages of book: CANONICAL AND UNCANONICAL GOSPELS With a Translation of the Recently Discovered Fragment of the Gospel of Peter, and a Selection from the Sayings of Our Lord not found in - the. Four Gospels. KY W. E. BARNES, B. D. ' ELI. mv Ol^ J'ETERItOUSK, AND THEOLOGICAL LEi ' CLARE COLLEGE, CAMBKIDGP . ECTfREK AT LONDON LONGMANS, GREEN, & CO. AND NEW YORK: 15 EAST x6 STRKK'I* 1893 All rights reserr'ftf P R E F A C E MY object in writing the following pages is to throw light on a subject on which many im portant misconceptions prevail. Even educated people are content to speak as if the Four Gospels had no history at all, or as if they first appeared in the fourth century A. C., coming from an unknown source. This treatise, there fore, will not be wholly useless if it makes it clear that the Canonical Gospels were beyond all doubt received as The Four Authoritative Gospels at least one hundred and twenty years before Constantino established Christianity as the State religion. Neither the first Christian emperor ( 311-337 A. D.), nor the great Council of Nicjea ( 325 A. D.), had anything to do with selecting, as some have supposed, our Four out of a large number of Gospels. If our Gospels were e\ r er selected ( and did not rather hold a position of authority from the first), the selection 8. E. B. P. W. B. 4 For all livo to Hun. viii PREFACE. took place apart from the worldly influence of a half-pagan emperor, and certainly more than a century before his reign. In the time of Con stantino, our Gospels had already a long and honourable history behind them. But I do not write these pages simply to dis prove the notion that the Gospels first became authorities in the fourth century A. a Still more prevalent is the more plausible contention that the Four Gospels ( with the exception of S. Luke) are not to be traced during the hundred and fifty years which immediately followed Our Lord's death. One object of this book is to show that this contention is false, and that even if it were true, it would be misleading. The main features of the Story of Christ's Life can be traced back continuously to within thirty years of His death. The narrative cannot be shaken, even if the usual authorities for it be proved to be more recent than we believe. The argument might have been much strength ened by a statement of the evidence to be derived from the use of one or all of our Four Gospels by the chief schools of heretics of the second century. Even the author of Supernatural Religion admits that the evidence to be derived PREFACE. w from Marcion's Gospel proves the existence of our Gospel of S. Luke as early as 140 A. D. But this evidence, together with other evidence drawn from the practice of heretical schools, is not given here, because it consists chiefly of a mass of linguistic detail. It may, however, be mentioned that all schools of Christian Gnostics of the second century, the Ophites, the Basili cleans and the Eastern and Western schools of the Valentinians all alike appealed to our Gospel of S. John. On the other hand, I have been careful to notice any evidence recently brought to light. Such evidence will be found chiefly under Tatian and Hennas. I have also tried to impart some freshness to the treatment of the subject by drawing from the original authorities wherever it was possible. This is especially the case with Eusebius, Justin, and Tatian. The rolti of au Apologist is an unpopular one, for it is supposed to be incompatible with a genuine search for truth. I confess that I am not dispassionate ; I am not indifferent which way the controversy is decided. I rejoice that I am led to the conclusion that the evidence for the authority of our Gospels is not weak but x PREFACE. strong. Yet such a temper can well coexist with a resolution to learn the truth, A com plete Apologist has to apologize to himself as well as to his fellow-men; what is meat for them is meat for him ; husks for them are husks for



PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the article, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

Related Free eBooks

Related Tags

DIGG This story   Save To Google   Save To Windows Live   Save To Del.icio.us   diigo it   Save To blinklist
Save To Furl   Save To Yahoo! My Web 2.0   Save To Blogmarks   Save To Shadows   Save To stumbleupon   Save To Reddit